As Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall takes on Tesco, will power, marketing and price beat taste and quality?
This morning I listened to 3 news updates on radio 4 about Hugh’s fight with Tesco. Each update gave 3 slightly different sides to the story and I wondered whether each sides PR company was frantically ‘correcting’ the news readers statement. The first treated Hugh as a crazy chef seeking fame, the second, Tesco ignoring consumer’s wishes and the third, that we would have to pay another £1 for a chicken at Tesco if Hugh had his way. Who will win this fight? And why has it come to this?
The balance between food price and quality has traditionally been set by government with ‘Food standards’, and consumers with free choice. As supermarkets have grown more powerful and separated consumer from producer the consumer’s don’t have enough information to make the right choice. As the media reports these hidden facts consumers realise they may be making the wrong choice and are confused. So far this has not bothered supermarkets as a confused customer may be seen as a marketing opportunity to improve shareholder return and customer goodwill.
Hugh and the media have messed up this marketing campaign. I hope.
I will be following this story closely as this is exactly why I set up BigBarn. Hugh and the media may raise awareness to the failings of the UK food industry but to fight the power we must offer consumers an alternative to the supermarket. The alternative to buy chickens direct from a local producer and personally check welfare standards.
As you have registered with BigBarn I know I am preaching to the converted to help the fight please get your friends to register here.
Thanks very much to all those who met me at the East of England show. If you were one of the mad fools who volunteered to have your photo taken with a Fine Food Crusader hat on
Follow BigBarn via these methods: